Using various techniques and several security tiers is common when mitigating software supply chain security threats. However, fixing any security flaws in your software application while it’s still in development is one of the most effective ways to keep it safe. This is especially difficult since not all software development life cycle models specifically handle software security concerns. Regardless of the software development lifecycle model you use, you must implement software development practices to maintain the security of your product.
This is where the NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework comes into play.
To support today’s ever-evolving digital environment, NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has created an essential manual to strengthen software development processes. NIST 800-218 provides a structured framework for developing secure and resilient software systems to withstand the ever-expanding variety of cyber threats. Every aspect of the framework, from risk management to secure coding methods, provides developers, security experts, and decision-makers the information they need to build reliable software in a world that is becoming increasingly connected.
In this blog, we will provide you with a brief overview of the NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework, including what it is, what it does, what its main practices are, and what the key considerations regarding this framework are.
What is the NIST 800-218 Security Software Development Framework?
The NIST 800-218 Security Software Development Framework (SSDF) outlines some of the essential processes you should adhere to to guarantee the security of the software you are developing.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has established standard software development security guidelines, which serve as the foundation for the SSDF, specifically addressing security challenges in software development. However, these were ratified only after the publication of the NIST SP 800-218 article, which contains definitions for the SSDF version 1.1.
While the high-level activities and practices were the same, most of the variations focused on the different instances. Based on these guidelines, risk was supposed to be weighed against cost, practicality, and application when choosing the practices to apply. One important aspect to consider was automating as many processes and tests that promote software security as possible. This could reduce the risk and impact of security exploitations due to undetected vulnerabilities.
The NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework promotes the integration of security testing across the software development life cycle, secure coding techniques, and a risk-based strategy. The framework strongly emphasizes ongoing observation, which promotes communication between the security and development teams. Organizations can improve software security, reduce vulnerabilities, and create resilient applications in the ever-changing world of cybersecurity threats by adhering to NIST 800-218.
What are the Four Practices of the NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework?
There are four categories in which the SSDF procedures fall. Every practice in the SSDF framework has a unique identifier and a synopsis explaining what it is, why it is good, and what has to be done to put it into practice.
With references to approved secure development practice documents, the framework also offers illustrations of instruments, procedures, and techniques for implementing the practices. The four pillar practices of the NIST 800-218 SSDF Version 1.1 are as follows:
Prepare the Organization (PO)
The development of secure software depends heavily on people. Consequently, the first step in putting the SSDF into practice is to ensure that everyone in your organization is adequately ready for the adjustments the framework will call for.
The first step is to determine the product’s unique security needs based on the tools used in the software development process. In this way, you can begin preparing the individuals and organizational levels, along with the people, processes, and technology they use.
The organization typically needs to be prepared by enlisting the support of upper management and providing staff with the required training. You might also include using technologies to automate processes and establish a safe environment for your preparation activities.
Protect the Software (PS)
This SSDF practice describes how to keep all of your software’s components safe from tampering and illegal access. This is a crucial step to safeguard your software’s source code and settings and to assist in avoiding unwanted code modifications, both unintentional and purposeful.
Depending on the circumstances, there are various ways to protect your program. When code is not meant for public consumption, it can help deter software theft and make it more difficult or time-consuming for hackers to discover security holes.
Users can ensure the software they purchase is authentic and unaltered by adhering to the guidelines provided in this section of the SSDF. Preserving software releases also helps detect, examine, and remove vulnerabilities in software after it has been released.
Produce Well-Secured Software (PW)
Throughout the software development lifecycle, there are fundamental processes to build well-secured software with few security flaws. These include:
- Selecting software configurations that are secure and assessing any third-party software component to guarantee its integrity
- Making sure the source code for your project complies with safe coding guidelines.
- Examining, evaluating, and testing your code to find vulnerabilities and fixing any problems found before the code’s release
- Using compilers and interpreters, among other build tool features, to prevent vulnerabilities
Respond to Vulnerabilities (RV)
It is important to remember that your program may still have vulnerabilities that you find after it has been released.
These vulnerabilities might be found by consumers, outside security researchers, or even internal testers in your company. Reacting quickly to these vulnerabilities as soon as they are identified is a crucial component of software security. A security flaw can inflict more harm the longer it is kept hidden. To assess new vulnerabilities and determine how to resolve them, each organization must have a vulnerability disclosure program in place in addition to other procedures that quickly help identify weaknesses and mitigate them.
Last, some considerations regarding implementing the NIST 800-218 SSDF in your organization exist. We will cover them in the following section.
Key Considerations of the NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework
The primary objective of NIST’s 800-218 SSDF is to assist organizations in integrating security into their software development processes and giving it top priority. When integrating security into the software development lifecycle, the SSDF needs to consider the resources, risk tolerances, and business requirements.
Here are the key considerations for implementing the NIST 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework in your organization:
Integrating the Framework into Your Software Development Lifecycle
Integrating security into your software development lifecycle’s many phases and stages is the first step in creating secure software. From the beginning of the development process, your development team must have a foundational security-focused culture.
Most of the time, common coding approaches create several vulnerabilities that hostile parties could later exploit after the software is launched. For this reason, developers need to consider security from the beginning and have a solid understanding of the techniques that close these possible attack points. It would help if you considered automating the process of testing and monitoring your program for potential vulnerabilities from the outset and considering the human components of software security.
Develop a Secure Software Development Policy
A safe software development policy is more than just advice on how to make your program more reliable. It should comprise a pre-defined set of instructions outlining the processes and procedures your organization adheres to for secure software development, called a secure software development policy.
Secure development policy documentation is necessary, for instance, if your program needs to adhere to security requirements like ISO 27001 or SOC Type 2 standards. Additionally, your software security team can create the policy documentation from the ground up and modify it to meet your unique requirements.
Third-Party Vendors
Writing secure code and adhering to internal security regulations must be more comprehensive. Most software still uses third-party vendors’ components, which might adhere to different security regulations than you do. Malicious agents frequently use these third-party code components as entry points for software supply chain attacks.
Thus, you should monitor all third-party components you use and confirm that the suppliers are completely aware of your security requirements and are fully compliant with the same security standards as you as part of your efforts to maintain security compliance throughout your software development lifecycle.
Code-Integrity Protection
Malicious actors could also use your software’s code and all its components as attack sites to introduce vulnerabilities into your program. In light of this, all programs should be stored in secure repositories that are protected from tampering to avoid this.
Ensuring the source code is only accessible to authorized developers is one aspect of maintaining code integrity. This should be guaranteed by the code repository you select, together with other measures to safeguard the login procedure and keep an eye on any modifications to your code. You may further enhance code integrity by using automation to track access statistics and do recurring code analysis.
Code Testing — Reviews and Checklists
Code testing is typically left until the very end of the software development lifecycle in the traditional software development methodology. However, this reactive method of finding software flaws has not proven successful, especially in recent years.
Setting up automated testing instead to continuously find bugs in the code as you build can be a more effective strategy. It is advisable for developers to personally inspect and check their code to avoid becoming frustrated when defects are later found. Building requires keeping track of many parts and components, so creating checklists makes it logical. This aids in making sure that your software development and monitoring team properly follows all of the procedures outlined in the SSDF policies.
Secure Default Settings and Quick Incident Responses
The default security settings in your new program should assist in shielding consumers from software vulnerabilities even without significant technical knowledge. To protect users even when they are just starting to use your program, you may also put policies that inform them of these default settings.
While secure default settings are necessary, vulnerabilities might still find their way into your systems invariably. They may prevail despite your adherence to the SSDF and other security standards. This is why it is essential to be prepared to address these vulnerabilities when they arise. This can entail assembling a team with well-defined plans and tactics to deal with security problems as soon as they arise.
The speed at which your company can address security flaws, or in other words, your incident response time, will significantly impact how damaging an attack is allowed to be. Malicious actors will have a reduced opportunity to exploit software weaknesses when discovered and addressed promptly. Consequently, vulnerability mitigation is also crucial to secure software development, which all organizations should consider.
Security and Compliance for Secure Software Development with Akitra!
Establishing trust is a crucial competitive differentiator when courting new SaaS businesses in today’s era of data breaches and compromised privacy. Customers and partners want assurances that their organizations are doing everything possible to prevent disclosing sensitive data and putting them at risk, and compliance certification fills that need.
Akitra offers an industry-leading, AI-powered Compliance Automation platform for SaaS companies. Akitra, with its expertise in technology solutions and compliance, is well-positioned to assist companies in navigating the complexities of ISO 42001 compliance. As this standard focuses on the responsible use of AI, Akitra can provide invaluable guidance in implementing the necessary frameworks and processes.
Using automated evidence collection and continuous monitoring, together with a full suite of customizable policies and controls as a compliance foundation, our compliance automation platform and services help our customers become compliance-ready for NIST’s 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework and other security standards, such as SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 13485, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, CCPA, CMMC, SOX ITGC, and more such as CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark, Australian ISM and Essential Eight etc. In addition, companies can use Akitra’s Risk Management product for overall risk management using quantitative methodologies such as Factorial Analysis of Information Risks (FAIR) and qualitative methods, including NIST-based for your company, Vulnerability Assessment and Pen Testing services, Trust Center, and AI-based Automated Questionnaire Response product to streamline and expedite security questionnaire response processes, delivering huge cost savings. Our compliance and security experts also provide customized guidance to navigate the end-to-end compliance process confidently. Last but not least, we have also developed a resource hub called Akitra Academy which provides easy-to-learn short video courses on security, compliance, and related topics of immense significance for today’s fast-growing companies.
The benefits of our solution include enormous savings in time, human resources, and cost savings, including discounted audit fees with our audit firm partners. Customers can achieve compliance certification fast and cost-effectively, stay continuously compliant as they grow, and become certified under additional frameworks from our single compliance automation platform.
Build customer trust. Choose Akitra TODAY!
To book your FREE DEMO, contact us right here.
