Every component of a financial institution’s business plan must consider risk. Mathematical experts have, thereby, created multiple financial risk models that influence banks’ loans and savings plans. Common security threats may also affect how banks protect their digital and physical resources and assets.
This is where the need for risk evaluations arises. In this blog, we are going to talk about lending risk assessments. These evaluations, guided by Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) principles in this case, are essential to maintaining the long-term viability of a financial institution.
The Fair Lending Risk Assessment (FLRA) methodology is intended to detect, evaluate, and reduce risks associated with possible lending discrepancies. It is based on the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act and is guided by the FAIR compliance regulations. This article will provide a brief overview of fair lending risk assessments, what is involved in one, what modest lending risks are, and how the FAIR principles help implement this methodology.
What is a Fair Lending Risk Assessment?
Fair lending risk assessments enable financial institutions to spot possible warning signs in their lending procedures that can unduly increase modest lending risk and ensure that unavoidable risks are as effectively minimized as possible.
Fair lending risk assessments can reveal any underlying tendencies in lending practices and prospective problems. This evaluation can identify potentially systemic issues that, even though they are unintended, may be signs of unlawful discrimination or other compliance-related risks by reviewing policies, processes, and data across the entire system. Common risks you can encounter while conducting a fair lending risk assessment include a need for more consistency in credit decision processes, irregular collection practices, and unequal distributions in some loan programs among various demographic groups.
What Does a Fair Lending Risk Assessment Involve?
For starters, a fair lending risk assessment includes testing protocols as part of a comprehensive evaluation process that guarantees uniformity across the organization. This entails routine oversight of outside suppliers who deal with clients on the bank’s behalf and third-party testing of internal procedures linked to loan origination and credit decisions.
Banks can also enhance their ability to detect such issues early and address them before they become a threat by conducting proactive risk assessments of their internal and external practices.
Lastly, any successful fair lending risk assessment helps stakeholders develop continuous training programs to teach employees about relevant industry laws and best practices. Banks must communicate frequently with staff members at all company levels, from entry-level workers to senior executives and board members, to ensure everyone has the skills to handle today’s complicated regulatory landscape.
The actions that should be covered by a fair lending risk assessment include:
- Review of policies and procedures across the system;
- Quantitative examination of the underlying lending practices and trends;
- Testing procedures to guarantee uniformity across the entire company;
- Surveillance of external third-party lenders and suppliers to ensure equity;
- Drafting continuous training programs for employees;
- Utilizing data for minimizing risks; and,
- Resources for employees to pursue further education
What are Fair Lending Risks?
“Risk” in the context of fair lending refers to the likelihood of the discrimination types outlined in the legislation above. Importantly, discrimination need not always originate from an evil lender operating obviously biasedly. According to an influential FDIC presentation on the subject, three discrimination vectors are crucial to comprehending fair lending risk. These include —
- Application of policies needlessly, which results in indirect discrimination
- Blatant prejudice in lending procedures or guidelines; and,
- Errors in judgment that result in unfair loan conditions or their rejection.
Fair lending entails locating and eliminating all possible causes of discrimination, regardless of how obvious or unintentional. Failing to do so may have repercussions for the lender in addition to causing direct harm to individuals who are discriminated against.
The institutions that enforce the vector discrimination regulations are:
- The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
- The Office of the Controller of Currency (OCC).
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
- The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
- The Federal Reserve Board (FRB).
- The Department of Justice (DOJ).
Thorough quantified risk analysis is the greatest approach to guarantee that your company is free from overt, indirect, or discretionary risk with regard to fair lending. This is where the FAIR approach is useful.
How FAIR Institute Principles Help With Lending Risk Assessments?
FAIR is an abbreviation of the Factor Analysis of Information Risk cybersecurity approach. The US-based organization FAIR Institute is leading the charge on FAIR, which the Open Group eventually embraced as a worldwide risk management standard.
In its essence, FAIR is a strong system of risk management built on the idea that precisely measuring hazards is the best approach to comprehend and reduce them. Unlike implicit, compliance-based models like NIST CSF, which depend on a reactive risk posture, FAIR is an explicit approach to risk management that facilitates a proactive risk posture more successfully.
The five components that form the basis of FAIR’s successful risk management are listed below:
- Reliable Risk Models – True quantitative analysis supported by complex quantitative values.
- Meaningful risk Assessments – Based on real scales, not just streamlined ordinal (1–5) categories.
- Efficient Risk Comparisons: Straightforward and uniformly expressed mathematical comparisons.
- Risk-Informed Decision-Making – Decisions supported by analysis and minimizing factors.
- Cost-Effective Management – Cost-and redundancy-cutting analysis and elimination.
These components reinforce one another. Combined, they produce a basic cybersecurity architecture that can be scaled up or down to fit any size business. However, in addition to deterring hackers and cybercrime, these measures also set the stage for the above-described study of the risks associated with fair lending.
Lending Risk Assessments with FAIR
Let’s first examine fair lending risk from a high-level perspective before defining it in terms of FAIR principles. There are two main categories of risk, as indicated by the FAIR flowchart:
- Loss Event Frequency: refers to the likelihood of a loss happening in a specific amount of time; and,
- Loss Magnitude refers to the range of monetary expenses resulting from the occurrence of a loss.
The first of them, the frequency of loss events, is further divided into two sub-categories:
- Threat Event Frequency: refers to the frequency with which “threat agents” are likely to take part in an action that could result in a loss event, such as any of the following:
- Contact Level Frequency refers to the frequency of contact between threat agents and catalysts that could allow them to initiate a threat event, known as the contact frequency.
- Probability of Action refers to the likelihood that a threat agent will act or the actions they are likely to perform that could cause a loss when it comes into touch with a threat vector.
- Vulnerability refers to the proportional likelihood that a certain threat materializes into a loss, taking into account the subsequent elements:
- Threat capability, or the specific threat’s proportionate power or force.
- Resistance strength, or the difficulty of a threat materializing into a disaster.
The second major category, loss magnitude, is made up of the following categories:
- Primary Loss: The short- and long-term expenses resulting from risks, such as:
- replacement prices, reaction times, and productivity;
- reputational costs and competitive advantage; and,
- penalties, agreements, and additional legal repercussions.
- Secondary Loss: Unrelated hazards related to the primary danger that are handled separately, beginning anew with the frequency and size of losses.
Numerical values are assigned to variables such as threat and risk at each category level. They are combined into a unified system to allow for intricate mathematical manipulation.
Overt instances of discrimination translate into threat events regarding fair lending risk. Less obvious variables, such as workers’ knowledge of discriminatory issues or lack thereof can be mapped onto threats, and such workers are then labeled as threat agents. You can compute vulnerability using your internal data and a matrix of probabilities open to the public.
FAIR aims to eliminate “intangibility” from the equation as much as feasible. By assessing your risk exposure, you may prevent discrimination before it occurs, the harm it does to borrowers, and any negative fallout for your business.
Security, Compliance, and Risk Management with Akitra!
Establishing trust is a crucial competitive differentiator when courting new SaaS businesses in today’s era of data breaches and compromised privacy. Customers and partners want assurances that their organizations are doing everything possible to prevent disclosing sensitive data and putting them at risk, and compliance certification fills that need.
Akitra offers an industry-leading, AI-powered Compliance Automation platform for SaaS companies. Using automated evidence collection and continuous monitoring, together with a full suite of customizable policies and controls as a compliance foundation, our compliance automation platform and services help our customers become compliance-ready for security standards like SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 13485, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, FedRAMP, CCPA, CMMC, SOX ITGC, and more such as CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark, Australian ISM and Essential Eight etc. In addition, companies can use Akitra’s Risk Management product for overall risk management using quantitative methodologies such as Factorial Analysis of Information Risks (FAIR) and qualitative methods, including NIST-based for your company, Vulnerability Assessment and Pen Testing services, Trust Center, and AI-based Automated Questionnaire Response product to streamline and expedite security questionnaire response processes, delivering huge cost savings. Our compliance and security experts will provide customized guidance to navigate the end-to-end compliance process confidently. Akitra Academy provides easy-to-learn short video courses on security, compliance, and related topics of immense significance for today’s fast-growing companies.
The benefits of our solution include enormous savings in time, human resources, and cost savings, including discounted audit fees with our audit firm partners. Customers achieve compliance certification fast and cost-effectively, stay continuously compliant as they grow, and can become certified under additional frameworks using a single compliance automation platform.
Build customer trust. Choose Akitra TODAY!
To book your FREE DEMO, contact us right here.
