Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept, it’s baked into daily business operations. From streamlining workflows to reshaping customer experiences, AI is now a core driver of efficiency and decision-making. But with this rapid adoption comes a growing blind spot: third-party AI solutions.
While it’s tempting to treat these tools as plug-and-play upgrades, relying on vendor-provided AI introduces a tangle of risks that many organizations overlook. The challenge isn’t only technological, it’s about governance, accountability, and compliance in a regulatory landscape that is tightening by the day.
This guide explores the hidden compliance challenges of third-party AI and offers practical strategies for managing them.
What Is Third-Party AI Risk Management?
In short, third-party AI risk management is about controlling the risks that come with using AI systems built, trained, or hosted by external vendors.
Unlike in-house tools, third-party AI often operates as a black box, you don’t fully know how the model was trained, what datasets it uses, or whether it aligns with regulatory obligations. That opacity creates compliance headaches.
Example: A company integrates an AI-driven recruitment platform from a vendor. If that tool shows bias against certain candidates, the company, not just the vendor, could be hit with lawsuits and reputational damage.
Why Third-Party AI Is a Compliance Challenge
At the core of this issue is accountability.
- If the AI makes a mistake, who is legally responsible?
- How do you prove GDPR or EU AI Act compliance when you don’t control the system?
- What happens if your vendor suffers a breach because of weak AI security?
Regulators are increasingly clear: both the enterprise and the vendor can be held liable. Passing the blame no longer works.
Hidden Compliance Risks in Third-Party AI
- Data Privacy Violations
Vendors may mishandle sensitive data, risking GDPR fines, HIPAA breaches, or unlawful cross-border transfers. - Bias and Discrimination
Without visibility into training data or fairness audits, companies risk discriminatory outcomes and legal exposure. - Lack of Transparency (Black-Box AI)
Proprietary models often limit explainability, making compliance with laws like the EU AI Act nearly impossible without vendor cooperation. - Regulatory Non-Compliance
Many vendors aren’t yet aligned with frameworks like the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, or ISO/IEC 42001, leaving enterprises exposed. - Cybersecurity Threats
Poorly secured AI models can be manipulated through data poisoning, adversarial inputs, or inversion attacks, leading to breaches. - Contractual & Liability Gaps
Vague vendor contracts can leave enterprises holding the bag in the event of failures, fines, or lawsuits.
The Regulatory Landscape
- EU AI Act (2025 onward): Classifies systems by risk, with high-risk categories (hiring, finance, healthcare) requiring strict audits and vendor documentation.
- GDPR & CCPA: Even if the vendor processes data, the enterprise remains responsible as the controller.
- NIST AI RMF: U.S. guidance focused on transparency, trust, and accountability.
- Sector-Specific Laws: HIPAA in healthcare, EEOC scrutiny in hiring, financial regulators demanding explainable credit scoring.
- ISO/IEC 42001 (2023): A governance framework for managing AI risks across industries.
Real-World Examples
- Recruitment Bias: A global firm faced lawsuits after its vendor’s AI recruitment tool penalized women applicants.
- Financial Transparency Gap: A bank was fined when its third-party credit scoring AI couldn’t explain loan denials.
- Healthcare Breach: A hospital suffered HIPAA penalties after its vendor’s diagnostic AI exposed patient data.
Best Practices for Managing Third-Party AI Risk
- Vendor Due Diligence
Review risk assessments, certifications, and data-handling policies before onboarding. - Contractual Safeguards
Define accountability, compliance obligations, liability, and audit rights in vendor agreements. - Transparency Demands
Push vendors for documentation on training data, explainability methods, and bias testing. - Continuous Monitoring
Treat procurement as the starting point, not the finish line. Schedule bias audits, compliance reviews, and performance checks. - Adopt AI Governance Frameworks
Align with NIST, ISO/IEC 42001, or EU AI Act readiness standards. - Cross-Functional Oversight
Build governance committees with compliance, legal, security, and technical teams. - Incident Response Planning
Ensure vendors are covered in escalation protocols and breach notifications.
Building a Third-Party AI Risk Program
- Step 1: Inventory all third-party AI in use.
- Step 2: Classify systems by risk level (high, medium, low).
- Step 3: Vet vendors against compliance checklists.
- Step 4: Deploy monitoring tools for bias, drift, and performance.
- Step 5: Train employees to recognize and escalate AI-related risks.
Looking Ahead
Third-party AI risk management is on the path cybersecurity took a decade ago, it’s becoming a board-level concern. Expect to see:
- Vendor certifications (like SOC 2 for AI).
- Automated auditing tools for bias and fairness.
- Shared accountability models between vendors and enterprises.
- AI governance as a core compliance pillar.
Conclusion
Third-party AI isn’t just a convenience, it’s a compliance minefield. Organizations that treat vendor AI as a black box invite risks ranging from data violations to regulatory fines.
The path forward lies in proactive governance: vendor due diligence, clear contractual obligations, transparency demands, and continuous monitoring. By embedding these safeguards, businesses can innovate with AI while staying on the right side of ethics, compliance, and regulation.
The winners in this space will be the companies that balance speed with responsibility, turning AI risk management into a competitive advantage.
Security, AI Risk Management, and Compliance with Akitra!
In the competitive landscape of SaaS businesses, trust is paramount amidst data breaches and privacy concerns. Akitra addresses this need with its leading AI-powered Compliance Automation platform. Our platform empowers customers to prevent sensitive data disclosure and mitigate risks, meeting the expectations of customers and partners in the rapidly evolving landscape of data security and compliance. Through automated evidence collection and continuous monitoring, paired with customizable policies, Akitra ensures organizations are compliance-ready for various frameworks such as SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 42001, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, NIST AI RMF, FedRAMP, CCPA, CMMC, SOX ITGC, and more such as CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark, Australian ISM and Essential Eight etc. In addition, companies can use Akitra’s Risk Management product for overall risk management using quantitative methodologies such as Factorial Analysis of Information Risks (FAIR) and qualitative methods, including NIST-based for your company, Vulnerability Assessment and Pen Testing services, Third Party Vendor Risk Management, Trust Center, and AI-based Automated Questionnaire Response product to streamline and expedite security questionnaire response processes, delivering huge cost savings. Our compliance and security experts provide customized guidance to navigate the end-to-end compliance process confidently. Last but not least, we have also developed a resource hub called Akitra Academy, which offers easy-to-learn short video courses on security, compliance, and related topics of immense significance for today’s fast-growing companies.
Our solution offers substantial time and cost savings, including discounted audit fees, enabling fast and cost-effective compliance certification. Customers achieve continuous compliance as they grow, becoming certified under multiple frameworks through a single automation platform.
Build customer trust. Choose Akitra TODAY! To book your FREE DEMO, contact us right here.
FAQs
Why is third-party AI such a big compliance challenge?
Unlike internal tools, third-party AI often functions as a “black box.” Companies don’t always know how the system was trained, what data it uses, or whether it meets regulatory standards. This lack of visibility creates risks around privacy, bias, explainability, and accountability.
Who is responsible if a third-party AI system causes harm or breaks the law?
Regulators are clear: responsibility is shared. Even if a vendor builds and manages the AI system, the enterprise using it can still be held liable for issues like bias, privacy violations, or breaches. Passing blame to the vendor is no longer a valid defense.
What are some examples of hidden risks in third-party AI?
Risks include biased recruitment algorithms, lack of transparency in financial credit scoring, data breaches from poorly secured healthcare AI, and vendors that don’t comply with frameworks like the EU AI Act or GDPR. These risks often surface only after damage has been done.
How can organizations reduce third-party AI risks?
Best practices include conducting thorough vendor due diligence, adding strong contractual safeguards, demanding transparency in training data and explainability, aligning with governance frameworks like NIST or ISO/IEC 42001, and continuously monitoring AI systems for bias, drift, and compliance gaps.
